By the way, the more expensive professional sound cards do not have such feature only because they imply a compulsory external hardware mixer console. The key difference from the reference sound was the lack of proper onrush sharpness and the lack of high-frequency clarity that resulted in slightly reduced stereo panorama. The control panel is designed as a single window that hosts everything necessary. Digital input As a receiver we used Lynx Two that indicated the following on the integrated cymometer: The card sounded surprisingly good:
|Date Added:||15 May 2014|
|File Size:||28.34 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Note there’s no traces of distortions and noise in the signal spectrum! This is a clear and obvious advantage.
I shall not fail to kick guys from Lynx Studio technical support that only shake their heads when asked about incorrect drivers operation and reboots caused by us trying to use the card with WinDVD 5. The control panel maya 44 mkii designed as maya 44 mkii single window that hosts everything necessary. The menu is rather simple. The card is budgetary as much as possible and the maga bundle adds only the manual and a software CD.
On the other hand, unlike AC’97 these are fully-fledged multibit delta-sigma I2S codecs with assigned sampling frequency; well thought-out line and mic signal analog amplification before ADC; mic preamplifier and headphones buffer. The card successfully passed maya 44 mkii examination without any criticism. Dynamic range test is even more interesting. The card provided the loud clear signal undistorted even at maximal volume.
It allows for manual mouse wheel maya 44 mkii for level adjustments. Line-In results were a real surprise being even maya 44 mkii than stated in the technical specs! To the right are digital modes and sampling rate buttons. By the way, the more expensive professional sound cards do not have such feature only because they imply a compulsory external hardware mixer console.
However, at a slightly higher price they are less handle for music making. The fact is that bit signal dynamic range is limited for any converters by the theoretical border of the format itself.
So, unlike usual sound mlii, our test maya 44 mkii eliminates the problem of swapping the back-panel line-out either for speakers, or headphones. In its time MAYA44 gained enough popularity being simple and all-sufficient for a professional home studio.
Audiotrak MAYA44 MKII sound card
It shows SNR in signal presence, dynamic reserve between full scale level and noise floor as well maya 44 mkii the low-volume signal playback quality. Measurements were made in RMAA 5. Contras The card is of little use for high-quality analog stereo playback auditory quality noticeable yields to Prodigy7.
Operation in professional applications was tested with the Steinberg Cubase SX 2. Very good Maya 44 mkii good Very good Results were generally the same in all modes that indicated ADC indifference to output data format.
Of course, card differences are negating to zero alongside the reduction of sound section price. BioShock Infinite and Metro: I must mark that MAYA44 MKII, like the majority of professional sound cards, meets mkiii maya 44 mkii that simplifies interfacing with various sound devices. Digital input As a receiver we used Lynx Two that indicated the following kkii the integrated cymometer: The turned-up real task was to compose something relaxing for our readers for the New Year.
All ESI cards feature the DirectWire technology of flexible signal routing between various interfaces. All tests were conducted using the Lynx Two reference card dB Maya 44 mkiilow-noise microphone maya 44 mkii, Proel, with gold-plated connectors. So, the 1dB dynamic range reduction will hardly be noticeable on affordably priced equipment.
Our steady readers might remember that we have already tested a number of Audiotrak sound cards, including Prodigy7. Video 3Digests Video cards: